Beneath our feet, a network of millions of miles of pipelines serves as the circulatory system of modern industry, transporting critical resources like water, oil, and natural gas. However, this essential infrastructure faces a relentless and often invisible enemy: corrosion. This silent threat is not a static issue but a dynamic chemical battle that constantly evolves inside the pipeline. The challenge for operators is not just detecting corrosion but doing so before the evidence changes. This is the "race against chemistry change."

Successfully managing this race requires a deep understanding of the two primary diagnostic approaches for internal corrosion: rapid-response field testing kits and high-precision laboratory analysis. In this article, we'll explore the advantages of immediate field testing for pipeline fluids, particularly how it captures critical data before chemistry alters during transport to a lab. We'll focus on fluid sampling from sources like pig runs and drip blowing, where timely analysis is crucial. We'll also discuss when laboratory analysis is indispensable and how a hybrid strategy can optimize pipeline integrity. Understanding these methods is key to safeguarding assets against costly failures in the oil and gas sector, especially for those dealing with internal corrosion threats.

Pipeline integrity is paramount. A single failure due to internal corrosion can result in catastrophic environmental damage, substantial economic losses from downtime and repairs, and severe risks to public safety. Proactive corrosion control and monitoring are not optional; they are essential for responsible asset management.

The global pipeline testing and inspection services market underscores the industry's commitment to this priority, estimated to grow from USD 46.13 billion in 2023 to USD 64.27 billion by 2030. This growth reflects the increasing emphasis on preventing internal corrosion through advanced monitoring techniques, particularly in systems handling multiphase fluids where water and corrosive agents accumulate.

For corrosion technicians and engineers, the focus often lies in internal corrosion, which differs significantly from external threats. Internal corrosion arises from the pipeline's contents, making fluid sampling a frontline tool. Fluids retrieved during pig runs or drip blowing provide direct insights into the corrosive environment, allowing for targeted interventions before minor issues escalate into major failures.



A pipeline is a contained, dynamic ecosystem where the chemical and biological composition of transported fluids is in constant flux. Temperature, pressure, and flow rates shift, altering the corrosive potential of the environment. Gases come out of solution, microbes multiply or die off, and chemical reactions occur constantly. This means a fluid sample extracted from a pipeline, whether from a pig run capturing accumulated water and debris or drip blowing to remove condensates, is a perishable snapshot. Its properties begin to change the moment it leaves the pressurized environment.

This instability demands routine monitoring, where field testing kits allow for on-site analysis, capturing the true state before these changes occur. Lab testing, though precise, risks analyzing an altered sample, which can lead to misguided decisions in internal corrosion management. For instance, in a pig run, the retrieved fluids might contain high levels of dissolved gases that drive corrosion, but delays in testing could allow those gases to escape, underestimating the risk.

To deal with this evolving threat in internal corrosion, operators rely on two distinct approaches with key trade offs. Field kits offer immediate, on-site measurements of pipeline fluids, providing a real-time glimpse into the pipeline's condition. In contrast, laboratory analysis delivers unparalleled depth and accuracy but introduces a critical time delay. The best strategy is to combine them and is central to winning the race against chemistry change and ensuring long term pipeline performance.

When sampling fluids from pig runs or drip blowing, field testing shines by preserving the sample's integrity right at the source. These samples may contain water and corrosive elements, making immediate analysis essential to avoid degradation during transport.



Pipeline corrosion is the gradual degradation of materials, typically metal, due to chemical or electrochemical reactions with the environment. It's a natural process that returns refined metals to their stable, oxidized state. For internal corrosion, effective control starts with understanding the mechanisms at play within the pipeline's fluids.

Most internal pipeline corrosion is electrochemical, requiring four components: an anode (where metal dissolves), a cathode (where reduction occurs), a metallic path (the pipe wall), and an electrolyte (often water in the fluids). Electrons flow from anode to cathode through the pipe, while ions complete the circuit in the electrolyte, leading to metal loss at the anode. This is particularly prevalent in carbon steel pipelines handling fluids with dissolved salts, acids, or gases.

Internal corrosion types vary based on the fluids' composition:

MIC can account for up to 40% of internal pipeline failures, highlighting the need for rapid microbial assessment in fluid samples.

The internal pipeline environment drives corrosion, with water in fluids acting as the primary electrolyte. Dissolved gases like CO₂, H₂S, and oxygen amplify corrosivity. While this article focuses on fluids, it's worth noting that gases, hydrocarbons, suspended solids, and sludges retrieved alongside fluids can create corrosion sites, leading to localized attacks. These mixed samples require careful separation to prioritize fluid analysis for immediate threats.



The core challenge in testing pipeline fluids for internal corrosion is that the in-pipe environment differs vastly from a sample bottle analyzed hours or days later. This "race against chemistry change" highlights the strengths of field kits over delayed lab testing for volatile parameters in fluids from pig runs or drip blowing.

Changes start immediately upon sampling:

These transformations can render lab results misleading if not mitigated, especially for fluids that are inherently unstable after removal.

This instability means delayed testing risks analyzing artifacts, leading to incorrect diagnoses and ineffective treatments. Field testing captures the transient state accurately, making it ideal for routine monitoring of internal corrosion via fluid samples. For example, a sample from a pig run showing elevated dissolved H₂S on-site might not show nearly the same result (or zero) back at the lab.



Field testing kits are engineered to win the race against chemistry change, allowing technicians to test fluids directly at the sampling point before degradation. This is particularly valuable for internal corrosion monitoring, where fluids from pig runs or drip blowing provide windows into the pipeline's health.

Field kits can provide some immediate results. They're usable in remote locations, cost-effective for frequent testing, and support trend analysis. For internal corrosion, field testing preserves sample integrity by measuring parameters like pH, dissolved gases, and microbial activity on-site, preventing changes from degassing or oxidation that could occur on the way to a lab.

A well equipped program for fluid sampling includes:

These tools are portable and user-friendly, tailored for the demands of field operations.

Despite advantages, field kits have lower precision and higher detection limits than lab instruments. They're limited in test range and susceptible to user error or environmental interference, such as heavy odorants. For complex internal corrosion issues, they serve as screening tools, necessitating lab confirmation.



For in-depth insights into pipeline fluids, lab analysis provides controlled, sophisticated testing unattainable in the field.

Labs measure to parts-per-billion levels, offering comprehensive profiles of fluids' water, deposits, and corrosion products. This detail is essential for further analysis, specific microbial identification, or validating remediation. Strict QA/QC ensures reliable, defensible data, crucial for regulatory compliance in internal corrosion programs.

Techniques for fluid samples include:

These methods provide the "why" behind field observations.

Time delays exacerbate chemistry changes in fluids, requiring preservation (e.g., refrigeration, stabilizers) and rapid transport. Higher costs limit use to targeted diagnostics, making field testing the preferred first step for routine fluid sampling.



Balancing speed, accuracy, depth, and cost is crucial for internal corrosion management through fluid testing.

Field kits prioritize speed, offering directional insights from fresh fluids; labs provide precision but later.

Field tests screen anomalies; labs diagnose root causes.

Field minimizes impacts by instant measurement; labs manage through protocols, but volatiles in fluids are at risk.

Field kits enable frequent, low-cost monitoring; labs offer long-term savings by preventing failures via accurate diagnostics.

Field testing is foundational for internal corrosion monitoring via fluids, providing on-site analysis to capture immediate conditions before changes.

Effective testing starts with strategic fluid collection. Focus on sources like pig runs (capturing accumulated water and corrosives) and drip blowing (removing fluids from low points).

Frequency is risk-based: monthly for high-risk wet gas systems, quarterly otherwise, or post-operational upsets. Regulations like PHMSA 49 CFR Part 192 and standards from NACE/AMPP mandate timely monitoring, especially in high-consequence areas.

Target change-sensitive parameters in fluids:

These provide immediate insights.

Rapid assessment is vital, as MIC thrives in fluids:

High counts may prompt a remedial plan.

While this article is fluid-focused, corrosion coupons (weight loss analysis after 3-6 months) and probes (electrical resistance or linear polarization resistance for real-time rates) can be installed at (or near) sampling points to collect direct data. This topic will be discussed in an upcoming article.



To maximize reliability, use standardized protocols for sampling, testing, and documentation. Ensure technician qualification / training, and chain-of-custody to maintain integrity for lab analysis. Emphasize sterile technique, safety, and accurate kit use. Record all details for traceability.

The fight against internal pipeline corrosion, particularly through fluid sampling, occurs on a shifting chemical landscape. Field kits deliver immediate intelligence from pig runs and drip blowing, while lab analysis provides forensic depth. A hybrid approach transforms data into actionable narratives for safety and environmental protection.



Established in 2011, Roberts Corrosion Services, LLC delivers comprehensive, turn-key cathodic protection and corrosion control solutions nationwide. Our end-to-end expertise encompasses design and inspection, installation and repair, surveys and remedial work. We provide drilling services for deep anode installations and a full laboratory for analysis of samples and corrosion coupons, as well as custom CP Rectifier manufacturing.

While our initial focus was on the Appalachian Basin area, we complete field work all over the US. We are a licensed contractor in many states and can complete a wide range of services.

Our biggest strength is in our flexibility for our clients. Solutions and Results.

Let us know how we can help.

Website

LinkedIn

Location: 39.251882, -81.047440

(304) 869-4007