Current Response Testing: Measuring What Your Pipeline Actually Needs
A Deep Dive Into Test Procedure, Worked Calculations, Anode Bed Design, and Why the Numbers Tell You More Than You Think
———————————————————————————
Introduction
You've pushed the rectifier to 80% of rated output. The annual survey came back with two test stations reading −0.82 V CSE and another at −0.79 V. The rest of the line looks fine. You've checked test leads, verified wire continuity, looked for shorted casings and foreign metallic connections. Nothing obvious.
The question you're staring at: is this a problem with how much current the system is delivering to that section, or is it a problem with how much current that section is demanding?
Those are two very different problems, and they lead to two very different fixes. You can spend months chasing one and never catch the other. Current response testing is how you figure out which problem you actually have. And it happens to be the same test you would have run during new construction to design the system correctly in the first place.
This article covers the complete current response test: why it matters, the equipment, the field procedure, the math behind the numbers, how to use the results to size an anode bed and specify a rectifier, and what to do when the data tells you something unexpected.
———————————————————————————
What Current Response Testing Actually Answers
A current response test — sometimes called a current requirement test — answers a single, precise question: how many amps does it take to move this pipeline to protection criteria from this anode location?
You apply a known, controllable current from a temporary source. You measure what happens to pipe-to-soil potentials as you step that current up. At some level, the pipeline reaches protection criteria. That current level, measured in amps from a defined location, is your answer.
The AMPP CP-2 Student Manual describes the value of this directly: "When a structure is in place in its final configuration, it is possible to perform current requirement tests. Such tests have the advantage of producing data on the actual structure and its environment and do not involve assumptions as to effectiveness of the protective coating and other factors."
That last part is the key. Every other method for estimating current requirements — current density tables, coating conductance formulas, percent-bare calculations — is built on assumptions. They're estimates based on what pipelines like yours typically need in typical conditions. They can be quite good. But they can also miss the actual condition of your pipeline by a significant margin in either direction, because they don't know about the coating job that was actually applied, the specific soil chemistry at your site, or the holidays that weren't logged during construction.
Designing from a table tells you what pipelines like yours typically need. A current response test tells you what your pipeline actually needs.
A test doesn't replace engineering judgment. But it replaces guesswork with measurement. For new construction, that measurement drives rectifier and anode bed design. For existing systems, it distinguishes between a current delivery problem and a current demand problem. Those two findings point in completely different directions.
———————————————————————————
Equipment: What You Need and Why
A current response test requires no permanent infrastructure. Everything is temporary, portable, and purposefully uncomplicated. Three things need to work together.
The Temporary Ground Bed
The temporary anode bed introduces current into the earth near the test section. Common options include:
Bare steel pipe or rod stock — the worksite standard. 1-inch schedule 40 steel rods, 2 to 4 feet long, driven vertically. They consume slightly during the test, but not enough to matter over a few hours.
Graphite rods — denser, more conductive, longer-lasting in aggressive soil conditions.
High-silicon cast iron (HSCI) anodes — purpose-built for low dissolution rate. The right choice for extended tests or high current levels.
Mixed-metal oxide (MMO) anodes on titanium — zero contamination risk, high output in a compact form. More expensive but appropriate for sensitive sites.
Placement matters. Position the temporary anode bed to simulate the intended current source — at the planned permanent ground bed location for new construction design, or close to the problem section for troubleshooting. Connect positive rectifier output to the anodes; negative output to the pipeline at the nearest test station.
The Portable Rectifier
Any adjustable DC source with readable output will work. A truck-mounted unit rated for 5 to 25 amps and 20 to 50 volts is typical. Output stability matters. A source that drifts during the stabilization window produces corrupted measurements. What you need: controllable step increments, steady hold at each step, and accurate readout of both amps and volts.
Reference Electrode and Meter
A saturated copper-copper sulfate reference electrode (CSE) is standard. Keep it maintained — a contaminated or dried-out electrode introduces errors that can make good readings look marginal. A high-impedance digital voltmeter (10 MΩ input impedance or higher) completes the setup. Place the reference electrode directly over the pipeline at each test station. The circuit is straightforward: reference electrode at the structure, voltmeter measuring pipe-to-soil, ammeter in series with the rectifier circuit.
———————————————————————————
The IR Drop Problem: Why You Must Wait
When you apply current to a pipeline through a temporary anode bed, two things happen simultaneously — and confusing them is the single most common source of error in current response testing.
The ohmic component (IR drop) is a voltage drop across the resistance of the soil column between the pipe and your reference electrode. When current flows through soil, a voltage gradient exists across that resistive path. Your reference electrode picks up that gradient. The reading on your voltmeter includes both the actual polarized potential of the pipe and this ohmic artifact from current flowing through the soil above it.
The polarization component is the actual electrochemical shift at the steel surface. This is what the −0.85 V criterion refers to — the polarized potential of the structure, not the on-potential with its ohmic component inflating the reading. Polarization reflects a real change at the pipe surface: the buildup of a cathodic boundary layer, the suppression of anodic reactions. It builds gradually as current is applied, and it decays gradually when current is removed.
The "on" potential tells you how much voltage is in the circuit. The instant-off potential tells you how much protection the pipe actually has.
The practical consequence: at high current or in high-resistivity soil, the on-potential can show −0.92 V while the instant-off potential reads −0.81 V. That 110 mV gap is IR drop, not protection. A system that passes on on-potentials but fails instant-off readings is not achieving criteria.
Instant-off measurement separates these effects. A current interrupter cycles the rectifier on a known schedule — typically 4 seconds ON, 1 second OFF. In the instant after current interrupts, the ohmic component collapses essentially to zero. The interruption can also throw a brief voltage spike, typically gone within 0.3 seconds. What remains once the spike has passed is the true polarized potential of the pipe. That's the reading that matters. The longer the OFF period runs, the more the polarization itself decays and the reading drifts positive.
Stabilization time is just as important. At each current step, the pipe-to-soil potential continues shifting more negative for some period after the current increase. Polarization takes time to develop — particularly in long pipeline segments where potentials at distant test stations lag behind those near the anode, and in highly resistive coatings that slow current distribution to holidays. The practical minimum is 15 to 20 minutes per step for most coated pipeline segments in moderate soil resistivity. If the potential at your most remote test station is still drifting by more than 1 to 2 mV per minute after 15 minutes, extend the wait. Rushing this step produces inaccurate current requirement numbers.
The CP-3 manual notes that in aerobic conditions, the polarization curve changes shape significantly with time — short-duration tests overstate required current because the full polarization benefit hasn't developed. If you can't wait 15 minutes per step, you're measuring circuit resistance and calling it protection.
———————————————————————————
Running the Test: Step by Step
The test is iterative: apply current in steps, wait for stabilization, measure, increase current, repeat until all stations meet criteria.
Step 1: Record native potentials. Before applying any current, walk every test station and record native pipe-to-soil potential, station ID, and time. Typical native range for unprotected steel in typical soils: −0.45 to −0.70 V CSE. These are your starting point.
Step 2: Set up temporary ground bed and portable rectifier. Install anodes, connect the circuit. Confirm polarity before energizing — negative output to pipeline, positive to anode bed. A reversed connection depolarizes the pipe rather than protecting it.
Step 3: Apply a low initial current. For a short, well-coated section, start at 0.5 to 1 amp. For a longer section or pipeline with older coating, start higher. Energize the circuit.
Step 4: Wait — 15 to 20 minutes minimum. This is not optional. Allow the system to polarize before measuring. If using a current interrupter, begin taking instant-off readings after 15 minutes and watch for stabilization before moving to the next step.
Step 5: Record instant-off potentials. Walk each station. Interrupt the current briefly and read the potential just after the interruption spike has passed — the spike typically lasts no more than 0.3 seconds. Record station ID, time, rectifier output (amps and volts), and instant-off pipe-to-soil potential.
Step 6: Step up current and repeat. Increase output by 0.5 to 1 amp and repeat the stabilize-and-measure cycle. For longer or more complex sections, larger increments may be appropriate — use judgment based on how the potentials are responding.
Step 7: Identify the threshold. The current level at which all test stations achieve −0.85 V CSE on instant-off readings (or 100 mV of polarization shift from native, if using that criterion) is the minimum current requirement for that section from that anode location.
Step 8: Record rectifier output at threshold. Note both current and voltage at the point where all stations meet criteria. The ratio — volts divided by amps — is the effective circuit resistance. That number becomes important for rectifier sizing.
———————————————————————————
The Math: From Amperes to Current Density
Once you have the threshold current, converting it to current density gives you a number that's comparable across different pipeline sections and conditions. It also tells you whether your result makes sense.
First, the pipe size issue that trips up a lot of calculations.
Nominal pipe size (NPS) is not the actual outer diameter. For pipe sizes up to and including 12 inches, the nominal size is a historical designation with no direct dimensional relationship to the actual OD. A 12-inch pipeline has an actual outer diameter of 12.750 inches. A 6-inch pipeline is actually 6.625 inches. A 4-inch is 4.500 inches. Starting at 14 inches and above, nominal and actual OD are the same.
Using the nominal diameter in a surface area calculation will consistently understate the actual pipe surface — and overstate your calculated current density. For a 5,000-foot run of 12-inch pipe, the difference between nominal and actual OD is 982 ft² of understated surface area. That's enough to meaningfully corrupt current density values and anode sizing math.
Always use actual OD.
Surface area calculation:
Surface area per linear foot = π × OD(in) ÷ 12
For a 12-inch NPS pipeline (OD = 12.750 in) over 5,000 feet:
SA/ft = π × 12.750 ÷ 12 = 3.338 ft²/ft
Total SA = 3.338 × 5,000 = 16,690 ft²
Worked example — new construction, 12-inch FBE pipeline:
A 5,000-foot section of 12-inch FBE-coated pipeline, newly installed, in clay loam soil with a measured resistivity of 5,200 Ω-cm. Six test stations at 0, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, and 5,000 feet. Temporary anode bed placed 150 feet offset from the pipe at the first test station.
Native potentials ranged from −0.617 to −0.635 V CSE across all six stations. Current was stepped from 0.5 A to 1.5 A in three increments.
Current Step | TS-1 | TS-2 | TS-3 | TS-4 | TS-5 | TS-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Native | −0.635 | −0.621 | −0.628 | −0.617 | −0.624 | −0.630 |
0.5 A | −0.738 | −0.724 | −0.718 | −0.716 | −0.721 | −0.733 |
1.0 A | −0.802 | −0.786 | −0.779 | −0.776 | −0.782 | −0.796 |
1.5 A | −0.871 | −0.857 | −0.851 | −0.852 | −0.856 | −0.866 |
All values are instant-off potentials (V CSE). Bold row = all stations at or beyond −0.85 V CSE.
Controlling station: TS-4 at −0.852 V CSE (3,000 feet from the anode — the farthest station still showing meaningful response from this ground bed location).
Minimum current requirement: 1.5 A
Current density: CD = I ÷ SA = 1.5 A ÷ 16,690 ft² = 0.0000899 A/ft² = 0.090 mA/ft²
For new FBE coating in well-controlled conditions, expected current density ranges from 0.02 to 0.10 mA/ft². This result, at the upper end of that range, is consistent with a freshly installed FBE line that was properly applied, inspected, and accepted before backfill. The construction went exactly as it was supposed to. A table-based estimate might have produced a similar number — or might not have. The test removes the question.
A result at 1.74 mA/ft² on new FBE, by contrast, is a finding. That's well above what the coating condition should require. Possible causes: coating damage during installation or lowering-in, more aggressive soil than anticipated, or disbonded areas under the coating. Whatever the source, a design built on a 0.3 mA/ft² table value would have produced a system that cannot protect this pipeline at steady state.
A current density that's two to five times higher than coating age and type would predict isn't a data entry error. It's information. Use it.
For reference, typical current density ranges across pipeline conditions:
Pipeline Condition | Typical Range |
|---|---|
New FBE or 3LPE, excellent application | 0.02 – 0.10 mA/ft² |
FBE or extruded coating, good quality | 0.10 – 0.30 mA/ft² |
Older asphalt or tape coating, fair condition | 0.30 – 1.0 mA/ft² |
Deteriorated coating, multiple holidays | 1.0 – 2.0 mA/ft² |
Essentially bare pipe | 1.0 – 3.0 mA/ft² (higher in acidic, hot or well-aerated soil) |
———————————————————————————
From Test Data to Anode Bed and Rectifier
This is where the current response test pays off in hardware.
Circuit Resistance
At the threshold current step in the worked example above, the portable rectifier logged 9.3 V at 1.5 A.
Circuit resistance = V ÷ I = 9.3 ÷ 1.5 = 6.2 Ω
For a new coated pipeline in 5,200 Ω-cm soil, a circuit resistance in the 5 to 10 Ω range is normal. Anomalously low resistance (under 1 Ω) suggests a metallic path or very poor coating. Anomalously high resistance (above 30 Ω) may indicate dry soil, poor connections, or an undersized temporary anode configuration. This baseline number is useful beyond sizing — track it over system life as the anode bed ages and coating degrades.
Anode Bed Sizing: Dwight's Formula
Once you know the required current and the maximum allowable circuit resistance, you can size the anode bed. For a single vertical anode, resistance to remote earth is calculated using the Dwight equation:
Ra = (ρ / 2πL) × [ln(8L/d) − 1]
Where:
ρ = soil resistivity (Ω-cm)
L = anode length (cm)
d = anode diameter (cm)
For a design scenario using soil resistivity of 4,500 Ω-cm and high-silicon cast iron anodes, 3-inch diameter × 60-inch length (L = 152.4 cm, d = 7.62 cm):
Ra = (4,500 / (2π × 152.4)) × [ln((8 × 152.4) / 7.62) − 1] Ra = 4.70 × [ln(160) − 1] = 4.70 × [5.08 − 1] = 4.70 × 4.08 Ra = 19.2 Ω for a single anode
If the rectifier budget allows a maximum circuit resistance of 4.33 Ω (for a 28V rectifier delivering 6 A, after 2 V of back voltage), a single anode won't work. Multiple anodes in parallel are required, and the bed has to leave room within that 4.33 Ω for the pipe-to-earth and cable resistance.
For N anodes spaced far apart (spacing much greater than anode length): Rparallel ≈ Ra / N. At typical spacings the anodes crowd each other and the bed resistance comes out higher; Sunde's equation adds that spacing term: R = (ρ / 2πNL) × [ln(8L/d) − 1 + (2L/S) × ln(0.656N)], with S the anode spacing in cm. Treat the Ra/N values below as a best case — at 15-foot spacing, six of these anodes come out near 3.9 Ω, not 3.2 Ω.
Anodes | Rparallel (Ω) | Voltage Required at 6 A (+2V back voltage) | Fits 28V rectifier? |
|---|---|---|---|
2 | 9.6 | 59.6 V | No |
4 | 4.8 | 30.8 V | No |
6 | 3.2 | 21.2 V | Yes |
8 | 2.4 | 16.4 V | Yes, with margin |
Six anodes brings the anode bed within budget. Eight provides meaningful headroom as the bed ages and resistance increases over the design life.
Rectifier Sizing
Size the rectifier for the measured current requirement plus a margin for coating degradation and anode consumption over the system's design life. Peabody notes that newly installed, well-coated pipelines "may initially require only a small amount of current, but as the coating stabilizes with time (or deteriorates from soil stress, temperature effects, etc.), it may require several times the initial current." A 1.5× to 2.0× aging factor applied to the measured value is standard practice.
Required voltage:
V = (I_design × R_circuit) + V_back-EMF
Using 2 V as a conservative back-EMF estimate:
V = (1.5 A × 1.5 × 6.2 Ω) + 2 V = 13.95 + 2 = 15.95 V required working range
Add 15 to 25% headroom: specify a rectifier rated for at least 20 to 25 V. If using the permanent anode bed at higher resistance, recalculate with that circuit resistance value.
For the 6-anode permanent ground bed example above: V = (6 A × 1.25 × 3.2 Ω) + 2 V = 26 V — and that counts only the anode bed. Even the low end of the 15 to 25% headroom recommended above takes that to about 30 V, more than a 28V rectifier, before the pipe-to-earth and cable resistance are added. Recalculate with the full circuit resistance and choose the next standard rating that covers it.
The specification comes from measurement. Not from a table, not from what the last project used.
———————————————————————————
Three Places This Test Gets Used
New Construction — Before the Rectifier Is Ordered
This is the cleanest application. The pipeline is in the ground. The anode bed is installed. The rectifier hasn't been specified yet — and that's the point. Run the test using the permanent anode bed leads in place of a temporary ground bed. You get a measured current requirement for the actual installed system under actual soil conditions at actual depth. The rectifier specification comes from that number, not from design table estimates.
This approach also provides the most reliable commissioning check available. Once the permanent rectifier is energized, compare its operating output to what the current response test said the system needs. If the rectifier is already at 90% of rated output and stations are still marginal, the system has a problem that should be found before the line goes into service — not discovered at the first annual survey.
If the test is conducted before the permanent anode bed is installed — during or immediately after pipe installation — a temporary ground bed at the planned permanent location gives you design-input data that replaces table-based estimates with field measurements. The difference between a system sized from a table and one sized from test data shows up at commissioning and every annual survey afterward.
After the Permanent Anode Bed Is In, Before the Rectifier Arrives
Sometimes the project sequence puts the anode bed in the ground before the rectifier is specified or procured. This is actually an opportunity. Connect the portable rectifier directly to the permanent anode leads and run the same test. You now have the measured circuit resistance for the permanent system, which means the rectifier voltage specification is based on real numbers — not estimates that may be off by a factor of two.
Peabody describes this explicitly: "Some pipeline corrosion engineers design and install impressed current ground beds before deciding on the rectifier rating. Following this procedure, it is possible to measure the installed circuit resistance and make new current requirement tests using the completed ground bed. Rectifier voltage and current ratings may be selected with full assurance that the installation will work as planned."
Diagnosing Low Areas on Existing Pipelines
This is the everyday troubleshooting application — the annual survey came back with stations that won't reach criteria. You've ruled out rectifier problems and confirmed the circuit is intact. Set up a temporary ground bed near the problem section and run the test.
The answer comes in two forms. In the first, modest additional current from a close temporary anode pushes all stations to criteria. The section is responding normally — it just isn't receiving enough current from the existing system. The fix is improving current delivery: a supplemental anode bed, a rectifier output increase, or a bond to an adjacent CP system.
In the second form, you're pushing far more current than the coating age and surface area would suggest is reasonable, and potentials are moving sluggishly or only locally. Current is going somewhere it shouldn't. That's a different investigation entirely.
The current response test doesn't fix the problem in either case. It tells you what kind of problem you have. That distinction determines your next move.
———————————————————————————
When the Numbers Don't Add Up: Anomalous Current Demand
If measured current density comes back significantly above what the pipeline's coating condition and age would predict, don't accept it as a baseline without investigating. Run through this sequence first.
Rule out measurement errors. Check for shorted test leads, a contaminated or dried-out reference electrode, or a loose connection at the anode bed. If one station is wildly out of line with the others, suspect the measurement before you suspect the pipeline.
Check for shorted casings. Casing-to-carrier contact is one of the most common current sinks on buried transmission lines. Measure current flow through the casing isolation test station. Momentarily disconnect the casing bond and watch the test current reading.
Look for metallic connections to foreign structures. A direct metallic tie to an unprotected foreign structure can silently drain large amounts of current. Current measurements across suspected crossing points and a Pearson survey can identify the source.
Check for coating damage. If no metallic connection can be found and current demand remains anomalously high, the coating is the primary suspect. DCVG surveys and bell holes at the highest-demand areas are the right next steps.
Consider localized soil conditions. Pipeline sections crossing high-moisture zones — stream crossings, swampy areas, zones with high water table — consistently draw more current than surrounding dry sections. That's normal. If elevated demand is isolated to a 200-foot section crossing a wet area, a supplemental anode near that section may be the answer.
If the pipeline is consuming far more current than its coating age and condition would predict, something is wrong. The current response test tells you clearly that the investigation isn't over — even if it can't tell you exactly what you're investigating.
The test result is a diagnostic signal, not a final answer. Use it accordingly.
———————————————————————————
Documentation: What to Record and Why It Matters
Current response test results are condition-specific. A January test in frozen ground is a different measurement than the same test in July with saturated soil. Temperature affects soil resistivity, which affects circuit resistance and polarization rate. Without full documentation, the number has no context and can't be compared to future tests.
At a minimum, record the following for every current response test:
Date and time of each current step and measurement
Weather conditions and estimated soil temperature
Location of temporary anode bed relative to the pipeline — distance, direction, and approximate depth
Anode type, number, and arrangement
Cable gauge and approximate length to anode bed and pipeline connection
Rectifier output (amps and volts) at each step
Stabilization time at each step
Measurement method — on-potential, instant-off, or both
Reference electrode type and condition
All native potentials by station before current was applied
The measured circuit resistance at the threshold current level is particularly worth preserving. It's a commissioning baseline. Run the same measurement against the same anode bed five years later and you'll see exactly how the system has aged.
———————————————————————————
Summary and Key Takeaways
A current response test answers one question: how many amps does it take to move this pipeline to protection criteria from this anode location? It replaces table-based assumptions with field measurements specific to your pipeline, coating, and soil.
NPS is not OD. For pipe sizes 12 inches and below, always use actual outer diameter in surface area calculations. A 12-inch NPS pipeline is 12.750 inches. Using nominal diameter in surface area calculations consistently understates pipe surface and overstates calculated current density.
Instant-off readings are required for valid data. The on-potential includes an ohmic IR component that can inflate readings by tens to hundreds of millivolts in high-resistivity soil. Read just after the interruption spike has passed (it typically lasts up to 0.3 seconds) to capture the true polarized potential.
Wait 15 to 20 minutes per step before recording. Potentials measured before stabilization reflect a transient state — not the steady-state response of the system at that current level.
Current density = measured current ÷ total pipe surface area. New FBE coating in well-controlled conditions typically runs 0.02 to 0.10 mA/ft². Results significantly above what coating age and type would predict are a diagnostic flag worth pursuing before accepting the number as a design input.
Circuit resistance (V ÷ I at threshold) is a commissioning baseline. Track it over system life — changes reflect anode bed aging and coating degradation.
Anode bed sizing uses Dwight's formula: Ra = (ρ / 2πL) × [ln(8L/d) − 1]. Multiple anodes in parallel reduce resistance to earth. Size the array so the anode bed resistance, plus the pipe-to-earth and cable resistance, stays within the rectifier's voltage budget.
Rectifier sizing from test data: design current = measured threshold × aging factor (1.5 to 2.0×); required voltage = design current × circuit resistance + back EMF; specify 15 to 25% headroom above calculated voltage.
On existing low areas, current response testing distinguishes current delivery problems (fix: supplemental anode, output increase, or bond to adjacent system) from anomalous current demand problems (fix: investigate shorted casings, metallic connections, coating damage).
Anomalously high current demand is a diagnostic flag. Run through measurement error, shorted casings, metallic connections, and coating damage before accepting the number.
Document everything. Test results are condition-specific and only comparable to future tests when conditions are fully documented.
———————————————————————————
Referenced Standards & Technical Resources
AMPP SP0169-2024 — Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems
AMPP TM0497-2022 — Measurement Techniques Related to Criteria for Cathodic Protection on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems
AMPP SP21424 — Alternating Current Corrosion on Cathodically Protected Pipelines: Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Monitoring
49 CFR Part 192, Subpart I — Requirements for corrosion control on natural gas pipelines
Peabody's Control of Pipeline Corrosion, 2nd Ed. (R.L. Bianchetti, ed.) — Chapters on Impressed Current System Design, Measurement Techniques, and Maintenance Procedures
AMPP CP-2 Student Manual — Chapter on Current Requirement Testing
AMPP CP-3 Cathodic Protection Technologist Manual — Chapter 4: Current Requirements; Tables 4-1 through 4-3 (current density benchmarks); Figure 4-6 (FBE coating conductance curves)
AUCSC Intermediate Course — Current Requirements and Design of Impressed Current Systems
AUCSC Basic Course — Chapter 6: Current Measurements
———————————————————————————
Roberts Corrosion Services, LLC
Established in 2011, Roberts Corrosion Services, LLC delivers comprehensive, turn-key cathodic protection and corrosion control solutions nationwide. Our end-to-end expertise encompasses design and inspection, installation and repair, surveys and remedial work. We provide drilling services for deep anode installations and a full laboratory for analysis of samples and corrosion coupons, as well as custom CP Rectifier manufacturing.
While our initial focus was on the Appalachian Basin area, we complete field work all over the US. We are a licensed contractor in many states and can complete a wide range of services.
Our biggest strength is in our flexibility for our clients. Solutions and Results.
Let us know how we can help.
Website
LinkedIn
Location: 39.251882, -81.047440
(304) 869-4007


